The Trump Battle Room tweeted out a video and supplied a transcript of what Trump prison skilled Jenna Ellis acknowledged they now have of their possession. You’ll gape Twitter deemed it mighty of a “disputed impart” mark:
“We now have sworn affidavits of oldsters that have considered now not handiest voter intimidation however these election officials telling them to count ballots in a outlandish diagram that is unlawful.” – @JennaEllisEsq pic.twitter.com/UGn2ofbNsU
— Trump Battle Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) November 21, 2020
That introduced up some questions, starting up with this one:
— Stacey – 1776 & MLK (@ScotsFyre) November 21, 2020
By that fashioned any tweet about what anyone acknowledged they’ve of their possession would possibly perchance perchance rep tagged as “disputed” — any tweet from a Republican, that is.
— Politics4US (@politics4_us) November 21, 2020
Is Twitter right assuming Ellis would possibly perchance perchance now not be telling the truth?
P.s. Pricey @Twitter – this impart is now not disputed till you produce proof & signed affidavits by witnesses disputing it & enthralling to express to it below penalty of perjury. Till then your spreading false recordsdata.
— AvngingAngel (@AvngingAngel) November 21, 2020
Disputed by who? Hipster twitter? https://t.co/ipsS3zfAad
— Jozef (@Jozef60642804) November 21, 2020
Too execrable there wasn’t a “impart is disputed” mark support when Democrats had been going nuts with the “Russia collusion” allegation — now not that Twitter would have frequent it.